Asset Protection Blog – Asset Management – Asset Allocation

June 25, 2009

Liability For Dog Bites

/** * */

“Every dog is entitled to one bite.” This saying refers to a legal tradition that a dog owner cannot foresee his dog is dangerous before the dog has actually bitten someone. The first dog bite puts the dog’s owner on notice to protect the public from his dog. Prior to the dog’s first bite, the tradition is that the dog’s owner cannot be held liable to foresee his dog’s poor behavior. Many people discount legal risk from their dog because they see their own dog as peaceful and well-behaved. People do not contemplate that their well-behaved dog could ever get them in legal problem prior to that “first bite.” In Florida, the law is different. There are Florida statutes on dog liability that holds owners liable prior to the dog’s first bite. Florida Statute 767.04 states that the owner of any dog that bites any person while the person is in a public place, or lawfully in a private space, is liable for damages of dog bits regardless of the former viciousness of the dog or the owners’ knowledge of such viciousness. If your dog bites, you pay. What makes matters worse is that many standard homeowner insurance policies and umbrella liability policies do not cover dog bites. Citizens Liability Insurance, the state insurance company, does not protect homeowners from liability on account of their pets. Check your liability policy. posted by Jonathan Alper, asset protection and bankruptcy attorney, Orlando, Florida

Original post: 
Liability For Dog Bites

/** */

How To Disappear – One Step Beyond Asset Protection | Visit …

Filed under: Asset Protection — Tags: , , , , — ShawnInOhio @ 6:31 PM
/** * */

Introduction – This is a simple guide to disappearing. Disappearing means not being found by people you do not want finding you. This is not illegal by itself even in many police states. People have many motives for disappearing.

Read more here:
How To Disappear – One Step Beyond Asset Protection | Visit …

/** */

California Ordered by Federal Court to Release Prison Inmates …

/** * */

(5 out of 5); Why Do Asset Protection ? 1 vote, average: 5 out of 5 (5 out of 5); Still in the loop? Protect your family! 1 vote, average: 5 out of 5 (5 out of 5); The expatriate advantage. 1 vote, average: 5 out of 5 (5 out of 5) …

Read the original here:
California Ordered by Federal Court to Release Prison Inmates …

/** */

Using Exculpatory Clauses To Limit Liability For Negligence

/** * */

Some businesses try to limit negligence lawsuits associated with their services or products by having customers sign agreements with “exculpatory clauses.” An exculpatory clause denies or limits the customer’s right to sue the business for the business’ own negligence. These clauses may influence some potential litigants to drop potential legal actions, but business owners should not rely fully on exculpatory clauses. Florida courts have viewed exculpatory clauses with suspicion and as being contrary to public policy. Courts have stated that they will consider exculpatory provisions only to the extent that their appeared to be a clear intention of both parties to relieve one party from liability and where the exculpatory language was clear and unequivocal. Also, exculpatory clauses can never insulate a business from willful, malicious or grossly negligent conduct which injures another person.

Read more from the original source: 
Using Exculpatory Clauses To Limit Liability For Negligence

/** */

Bank Asset-Liability Management [MAGAZINE SUBSCRIPTION]

Filed under: asset management — Tags: , , , , — ShawnInOhio @ 5:41 PM
/** * */

Bank Asset-Liability Management

Product Description
Offers practical ways to reduce exposure to interest rate risks, whether it’s from the asset or liability side of the balance sheet.

Product Description
Offers practical ways to reduce exposure to interest rate risks, whether it’s from the asset or liability side of the balance sheet.

(more…)

/** */

More Jobs Lost in USA and European Union: 01/27/09 | Visit …

/** * */

(5 out of 5); Why Do Asset Protection ? 1 vote, average: 5 out of 5 (5 out of 5); Still in the loop? Protect your family! 1 vote, average: 5 out of 5 (5 out of 5); The expatriate advantage. 1 vote, average: 5 out of 5 (5 out of 5) …

Here is the original:
More Jobs Lost in USA and European Union: 01/27/09 | Visit …

/** */

Asset Protection BLOG – Mark Nestmann: The Justice Department Plan …

/** * */

I’ve written many times in this blog on the abominable practice of “civil forfeiture,” a legal procedure in which prosecutors can seize your property without accusing you—much less convicting you—of any crime.

Original post:
Asset Protection BLOG – Mark Nestmann: The Justice Department Plan …

/** */

The Justice Department Plan to Maximize Asset Forfeiture

/** * */

I’ve written many times in this blog on the abominable practice of “civil forfeiture,” a legal procedure in which prosecutors can seize your property without accusing you—much less convicting you—of any crime. The civil forfeiture racket raises billions of dollars for federal, state, and local governments.  Most of the time, the seizing agency gets to keep the money it confiscates, creating a bounty hunter mentality throughout the law enforcement system. But that’s not enough, according to the U.S. Department of Justice.  The DOJ is now implementing its first-ever National Asset Forfeiture Strategic Plan, with the goal of ensuring that prosecutors recover every last dollar of potentially forfeitable assets.  That’s a big job, because more than 300 federal laws authorize civil and/or criminal asset forfeiture.  Not to mention tens of thousands of state, local, and county asset forfeiture laws and ordinances. According to former assistant Attorney General Alice S. Fisher: “Today, there is legal authority to forfeit the proceeds of virtually all serious offenses including terrorism, drug trafficking, organized crime, child pornography, alien smuggling, human trafficking, white collar crime, and money laundering. The National Asset Forfeiture Strategic Plan seeks to develop and implement policies and procedures to ensure that asset forfeiture is an integral part of every investigation and prosecution.” In other words, the government wants to make absolutely sure that no forfeitable assets slip through the proverbial cracks. How might this affect you?  Well to begin with, consider what might happen if you have undeclared monies outside the United States and have used a structure such as an offshore trust or international business company (IBC) to hold those funds.  It would be difficult for prosecutors to claim that mere failure to disclose a foreign account constitutes money laundering.  However, what if prosecutors discover you’ve formed a bearer share IBC, and you’ve used it to operate a bank account that has generated hundreds of thousands of dollars in untaxed profits?  Under that scenario, prosecutors could argue that you’re using “sophisticated means” to defraud the government.  This elevates a relatively mundane reporting violation into a tax fraud case involving money laundering.  And in a money laundering prosecution, the government can confiscate not only the proceeds of a crime, but all assets “facilitating” that crime. A jury might or might not agree that your domestic bank accounts, your home, your vehicle, and your business “facilitated” a money laundering violation, but that doesn’t prevent a prosecutor hunting for scalps from alleging that they did.  And in many cases, prosecutors can freeze your assets pending trial. There’s no question that the Obama administration and is determined to go after tax evaders who move their money offshore.  Nor is there any question that the Department of Justice wants to maximize forfeiture revenues by any means necessary.  That makes it more important than ever to be 100% compliant in your offshore dealings—or face the consequences. Copyright © 2009 by Mark Nestmann

See more here:
The Justice Department Plan to Maximize Asset Forfeiture

/** */

Asset Allocation, 4th Ed (Kindle Edition)

Filed under: asset Allocation — Tags: , , , , — ShawnInOhio @ 3:24 PM
/** * */

Asset Allocation, 4th Ed

Product Description
The definitive guidebook for successful long-term investing. The third edition of Roger C. Gibson’s Asset Allocation was released in 2000 on the heels of the biggest bull market in a century and amidst talk of a new economy. The bear market that followed was the worst since 1973-1974 and resulted in the destruction of roughly half of the stock market’s value. Through it all, Roger Gibson’s advice to investors remained the same. Gibson once again offers techniques (more…)

/** */

Precious Metals Little Changed Again | Visit Offshore Inn when …

/** * */

(5 out of 5); Why Do Asset Protection ? 1 vote, average: 5 out of 5 (5 out of 5); Still in the loop? Protect your family! 1 vote, average: 5 out of 5 (5 out of 5); The expatriate advantage. 1 vote, average: 5 out of 5 (5 out of 5) …

More here:
Precious Metals Little Changed Again | Visit Offshore Inn when …

/** */ Older Posts »

Powered by Asset Protection Blog

Twitter links powered by Tweet This v1.6.1, a WordPress plugin for Twitter.