March 2010
M T W T F S S
« Feb    
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  

Categories

Federal Agencies Can Garnish Head Of Household Salary Of Florida Debtors

Don’t Say I Didn’t Warn You About Deeds In Lieu Of Foreclosure

Garnishment of Alimony

Mortgage Modification: An Explanation Of Why Lenders Prefer Foreclosure Of Delinquent Mortgages

Client Overpays Estimated Taxes Used To Shield Money From Potential Creditors In IRS Account

Good Article About Credit Rating Myths

Size Of Municipal Homestead Lot Partly Under Water

Your house in a municipality is homestead provided the lot is no larger than ½ acre. If the city homestead lot is greater than ½ acre the protection is applied pro rata. For example, for a lot 1 acre in size within a city only 50% of the equity is protected as homestead. This week I spoke with a man who lived on a lake front lot in the city. The lot was barely over ½ acre. The lot survey showed that the side lot lines extended several feet into the lake so that a significant part of the lot was under the lake. The dry land was less than ½ acre in size. The man asked me if the part of the lot under the lake counted toward the calculation of his homestead exemption. I have never seen this issue, and I’m not aware of any judicial decision dealing with the issue. My sense is that the land under the lake which is part of the lot’s legal description counts in the homestead calculation so that a portion of his equity is not homestead protected. I am not aware of any legal authority that a debtor can deduct from the acreage calculation parts of his residential lot that is not usable for some reason. If a portion of a city lot could not be used for building because it was wetlands, for example, I do not think the debtor could deduct the wetlands from the lot size to fall within the ½ acre limit. This man could ask a surveyor to segregate the dry land and the wet part of the lot on a new survey. He could then create an entity (LLC, partnership etc) and deed the land under the lake to the separate entity. This conveyance may increase real estate taxation, and it could bring objections from a homeowners association. Local laws which prohibited subdivision of the lot may not become a practical problem since he would not build on the conveyed lake property. Even though there could be legal issues, the conveyance would be of record, and it would prevent, or at least make more difficult, the forced sale of the homestead by a judgment creditor. posted by Jonathan Alper, asset protection and bankruptcy attorney, Orlando, Florida [...]

Court Protects Homestead Property Used For Debtor’s Commercial Business

Homestead protection applies to homes and land occupied by a debtor as his primary residence. Property used for commercial purposes or for the production of income generally does not qualify for homestead protection. A Florida bankruptcy court recently considered married joint debtors who used part of a homestead property for his residence and part of the same property for business and income production. The issue was whether the partial business use disqualified all or part of the debtors’ homestead protection from their judgment creditors. The two debtors owned a five acre parcel of land in the county. They built their residence on a minority portion of the land. The debtors had two more buildings on the same land. One building was a warehouse used exclusively for the debtors’ business. The third building was a second residence rented to an unrelated third party. In other words, two of the three structures occupying most of the property were used commercially. The bankruptcy court held that the entire land and all three structures were protected from the debtors’ creditors in his bankruptcy proceeding and were not subject to administration as part of the bankruptcy estate pursuant to the homestead exemption.. The court found that the Constitutional homestead clause does not disqualify a homestead because the owner uses the property commercially or for the production of rental income. The court said that, the “Debtors’ commercial use of the Building (rental) and the Warehouse does not preculd them from claiming the entirety of the Real Property as exempt.” The court recognized that other bankruptcy courts reached opposite conclusions in earlier cases. The case is: In re: Earnest , Case No. 08-4408-3F7. posted by Jonathan Alper, asset protection and bankruptcy attorney, Orlando, [...]

Estate Planning Trusts Can Jeopardize Homestead Protection

Asset protection planning is part of estate planning. Tax planning is part of estate planning. Often, however what is good tax planning is not good for asset [...]